p_069I’m getting a lot of questions from my Australian (and non US) readers about the new FTC Guidelines and how they apply to us.

Each of us are on a number of mailing lists and there is an awful lot of hype coming through – about how you will be fined if don’t meet the new FTC guidelines.

I can only speak from an Australian point of view – but I’m certain that my understanding covers most other countries, even if the legislative provisions are different.

The FTC is the Federal Trade Commission and it’s “role” is to “protect America’s consumers”.   This is the equivalent of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (the ACCC), which adminsters the Trade Practices Act.

From everything I have read, the new FTC guidelines appear to relate to the use Endorsements and Testimonials which may be considered deceptive or misleading and expand on the disclosure of when payments (in product, money or services) is received for endorsements.

The main issue is that many products are sold using Endorsements and Testimonials that show results that are NOT typical – that is the majority of the people who used the product or service, did not experience similar results.

This also relates to bloggers and recommendations we make from our sites and on our social networks.

So how does this relate to the Australian Laws and the ACCC?  The Trade Practices Act (1974) (TPA) specifically refers to Testimonials and Endorsements and to Deceptive and Misleading advertising.  The ACCC  states that:

Businesses must ensure that any representations or claims they make are accurate and truthful. The law prohibits conduct that may mislead or deceive customers.

For example, having a celebrity claim that they have used a particular product that they have never used, or even by claiming a celebrity has said something about a product that they have not said – is considered misleading or deceptive.

The ACCC guidleines are similar to those of the FTC, but in my opinion, the FTC is taking the guidelines for false and misleading advertising to the next level.

Essentially, the FTC guidelines require a endorsement or testimonial to reflect the typcial results experienced by users of a product or service.  It is no longer sufficient to show a testimonial saying a purchaser experienced a 1000% growth in income after applying the techniques shown in a guide – IF 20 out of 25 purchasers only experienced a 5% increase in income.  The 5% increase is considered typical.  Labelling an atypcial testimonial as ‘not usual results’ (or similar) is no longer sufficient….

Another aspect of the FTP guidelines is the extension of the examples provided for where a ‘material connection’ (sometimes payments or free products), that a consumer would not expect, exists between advertisers and endorsers.  The additional examples address what constitutes an endorsement when the message is conveyed by bloggers or other “word-of-mouth” marketers.  Whilst decisions will be made on a case-by-case basis, if a blogger posts an article and receives cash or in-kind payment to review a product – this is considered an endorsement and should be disclosed to readers.

This would be true for affiliate marketers too – when reviewing a product or service and using your affiliate link, the FTC guidelines indicate that you should disclose that connection.

The Australian Trade Practices Act does not go to that level of disclosure (yet) – although, for services like the Financial Services and Insurance Industries, the fact that advisors may receive a commission for a sale must be revealed.

Personally, I think the guidelines are great.  I have always been a supporter as ‘say it as is’, removing the hype.  I also believe that if you want to be an affiliate marketer and sell products or services – try them first, or at least find someone you know and trust who has used the products or services – and be honest about them.

Creating a Disclosure Statement for your site, along with your Privacy Statement and Terms and Conditions is also appropriate – there is an excellent example of a Disclosure Statement on Lynn Terry’s Clicknewz blog.  This is a great idea for anyone and something that I will be implementing over the coming days.

The thing for Aussies to remember is to not make false claims or be misleading with our marketing or recommendations – write honest reviews and consider disclosing your affiliations.

What are your thoughts?

About the Author Charly Dwyer

Charly has more than 30 years experience in the IT industry ranging from hands-on technical, to high-level business management, Charly has installed and configured computing equipment and has managed business contracts in excess of $25 million dollars.

As a result, Charly identifies the best way to integrate solutions and technologies for the most cost effective way to achieve a businesses outcome.

Share your thoughts

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked

  1. Great article. Smart, intelligent, reliable. I find the new FTC rules also great. After 13 months on the net, I have to admit that I purchased a lot of hype. It’s not only a money question. After a while, a piece of your self-esteem is lost as well. You are angry with yourself making the same mistake again: believing in good written sales letters. It’s time for a new internet marketing culture.

  2. Hi Charly

    It is interesting to note how many Gurus are now giving away their products, perhaps because of the FTC ruling?

    I think the ruling is a great idea, but maybe a little hard to police?

    Thanks for the article
    Wendy

  3. Hi Wendy,

    Thanks for the thoughts – it’s interesting seeing the impact of the ruling out in the Internet world.

    From the Australian perspective, all consumers are able to report breaches of the Trade Practices Act through their local Fair Trading Department (local government) or through the ACCC directly.

    I’m sure the FTC is watching for certain things and will investigate other sites as they are made aware of the issue.

    They most certainly won’t get all of the breaches, but they are levying hefty fines etc which will serve to ‘frighten’ others into compliance.

    I’m not sure about the Guru’s giving away their products. One that I know of is giving away a product that has been on the market for several years – I’m assuming that it’s time for that product to evolve and the ‘guru’ is capitalizing on the last wave of the product sales.

    Cheers,
    Charly

{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}